CT-TAE PDF Dumps 2023 Exam Questions with Practice Test [Q20-Q35] – Unlimited Lifetime Access Free Exams PDF

Rate this post

CT-TAE PDF Dumps 2023 Exam Questions with Practice Test

Dumps for Free CT-TAE Practice Exam Questions

The test automation engineer certification covers a wide range of topics related to test automation, including test automation design, planning, and execution. Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer certification also includes topics such as test automation frameworks, scripting, and development. CT-TAE exam is designed to test the candidate’s knowledge and skills in these areas and ensure that they have a comprehensive understanding of the field.

NO.20 Which of the following statements about the reuse of TAS artefacts is TRUE?

Reusable TAS artefacts can include components (or parts of components) associated with different layers of the TAA

To enable reuse of TAS artefacts, a good design for reuse is built into the TAA and to further action are needed during the TAS lifecycle

Communications maintenance and improvements for reusing TAS artefacts are modify addressed during the design of the TAA

Reusable TAS artifacts associated with the definition layer of the TAA include the adaptors to the SUT components and/or interfaces

NO.21 A major component of your organisation’s Test Automaton Solution (TAS) is a popular open-source third-party capture-replay tool for automated functional testing.
Which two of the following must the Test Automation Engineer (TAE) ensure happens for this TAS?
a) The third party tool is placed under configuration management control.
b) The annual support and maintenance costs are agreed with the tool’s vendor.
c) It is Important to obtain information about updates and new versions of the tool so that the third party tool is kept up to date.
d) Ensure that the TAS test scripts are integrated into the tool’s framework.
e) Ensure that no changes are made to the tool, because modifications are not allowed for third party products.

a and b

c and d

a and c

d and e

NO.22 You are testing a major enhancement to an air traffic control user interface. You have use of a sophisticated pre-production test environment, created specifically for large scale automated regression, performance and security testing. The window for regression testing is limited and must successfully conclude, with no major regressions remaining, before the non-functional testing starts.
You have been using the same version of the TAS for the last few releases, each time completing the automated regression test suite in a single overnight run. However, due to the latest enhancements for the SUT, you believe there is a risk that the test suite may no longer complete overnight and therefore delay performance and security testing.
Which option would be the BEST and MOST cost-efficient approach to mitigate this risk?

Create a mirror of the pre-production test environment and split the regression test suite to run in parallel across the environments.

Split the regression test suite into multiple parts, running in the environment across consecutive nights.

Analyse the regression test suite and remove test coverage duplication and redundancy.

Introduce better coding practices for the automation scripts, including coding guidelines, reviews and improved static analysis.

NO.23 Consider A TAS for testing a desktop application via its GUI. All the test cases of the automated test suite contain the same identical sequences of steps at the beginning (to create the necessary objects when doing a preliminary configuration of the test environment and at the end (to remove everything created -specifically for the test itself during the preliminary configuration of the test environment). All automated test cases use the same set of assertion functions from a shared library, for verifying the values in the GUI fields ( e.g text boxes).
What is the BEST recommendation for improving the TAS?

Implementing keywords with higher level of granularity

Improving the architecture of the application in order to improve its testability

Adopting a set of standard verification methods for use by all automated tests

Implementing standard setup and teardown functions at test case level

NO.24 You are currently designing the TAA of a TAS. You have been asked to adopt an approach for automatically generating and executing test cases from a model that defines the SUT. The SUT is a state-based and event-driven that is described by a finite-state machine and exposes its functionality via an API. The behavior of the SUT depends on hardware and communication links that can be unreliable.
Which of the following aspects is MOST important when designing the TAA in this scenario?

Looking for tools that allows direct denoting of exceptions and actions depending on the SUT events.

Adopting a test definition strategy based on classification tree coverage for the test definition layer.

Looking for tools that allow performing setup and teardown of the test suites and the SUT.

Adopting a test definition strategy based on use case/exception case coverage for the definition layer.

NO.25 When if the BEST time for automation to consider legal and/or standard requirements for a SUT?

When implementing the SUT

When designing a TAF

When designing a TAA

When developing a TAS

NO.26 Which of the following attributes should NOT be included in a test execution report associated with a suite of automated tests?

Summary of the test execution results

System/Application under test and its version

Defect clusters identified during test execution

Environment in which the tests have been executed

NO.27 Which of the following CORRECTLY describes how automation SHOULD be applied to confirmation testing?

Confirmation tests are not good candidates for automation as they are not designed to run many times

Confirmation tests should only be automated if they fail to pass on the first attempt

Confirmation tests can be automated and incorporated into an automated regression suite to show whether defects that were previously fixed reoccur

A confirmation test should only be automated after it has been run manually

NO.28 You have inherited a TAS that is working well it uses keyword-driven scripting and was well architected. The automation architect who built the system has now moved on to another company. The TAS is working across several projects and has a multiple library of keywords, categorised by project. The individual project teams maintain these keyword scripts.
Based only on the given information, what is the MOST significant risk for the TAS?

The keyword driven scripts may become out of date if not maintained

The level of abstraction, coupled with the departure of the architect may make the system hard to maintain

New projects may not work as well with the TAS as the current projects

Because the keyword scripts are maintained by different teams, there is a likelihood that good coding standards are not followed

NO.29 Designing the System Under Test (SUT) for testability is important for a good test automation approach and can also benefit manual test execution.
Which of the following is NOT a consideration when designing for testability?

Observability: The SUT needs to provide interface that give insight into the system.

Re-useability: The code written for the SUT must be re-useable for other similar system.

Clearly defined architecture: The SUT Architecture needs to provide clear and understandable interfaces giving control and visibility on all test levels.

Control: the SUT needs to provide interfaces that can be used to perform actions on SUT.

NO.30 What are the four horizontal layers of the gTAA?

Test adaptation, test execution, test design, test definition

Test generation, test execution, test definition, test APIs

Test generation, test definition, test execution, test adaptation

Test definition, test execution, test reporting, test adaptation

NO.31 Consider a TAS deployed into production. The SUT is a web application and the test suite consists of a set of automated regression tests developed via GUI. A keyword-driven framework has been adopted for automating the regression tests. The tests are based on identification at low-levels of the web page components (e.g class indexes, tab sequence indexes and coordinates) in the next planned release the SUT will be subject to significant corrective maintenance (bug-fixes) and evolution (new features) Maintenance costs to update the test scripts should be as low as possible and the scripts must be highly reusable.
Which of the following statements is most likely to be TRUE?

The keyword-driven framework is not suitable, it would be better to adopt a structured-scripting approach

False positive errors are likely to occur when running the automated tests on the new releases without modifying the test

The total execution time of the automated regression test suite will decrease for each planned release.

The keyword-driven framework introduces a level abstraction that is too high and makes it difficult what really happens

NO.32 You have executed an automated test suite for a product that was released into production. Although all the tests passed, there was a major failure in production in an area that was covered well by your automated tests.
You have run the automated tests again and one of the tests is now failing and this is directly related to the production defect that was raised. You decide to run the automated test suite again on the same version of the SUT and the test now passes.
What SHOULD you do now to verify the validity of the automated tests?

Remove the intermittently failing test from the test suite and investigate the reason why the test sometimes passes and sometimes fails.

Check that the production defect that was reported was an actual defect

Run the automated test suite again and if the test now passes – do nothing

Reference: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341396240_Intermittently_Failing_Tests_in_the_Embedded_Systems_Domain

NO.33 Which of the following success factors for a test automation project is TRUE?

Automated tests must be designed to capture only the data that is strictly needed for comparing expected and actual results

The test cases to be automated first must always be selected based on the number of times a test will need to be run

The test cases to be automated must have a high dependency on particular data values

Automated tests that fail due to changes in the requirements of the SUT should be promptly fixed rather than disabled from the test suite

NO.34 You are using a gTAA to create a TAS for a project. The TAS is aimed at automatically and executing test cases based on a use-case Modeling approaching that uses UML as a modeling language. All the interaction between TAS and SUT will only be at the API and GUI level.
Which of the following components of the gTAA would you EXCLUDE from the TAS?

The test reporting component of the test execution layer.

The Test execution component of the test generation layer

The test execution (test engine of the test execution layer

The Command Line Interface (CLI) component of the test adaptation layer

NO.35 You are implementing test automation for a project and you want to be able to generate test cases automatically using a series of test design tools which use a variety of test design techniques such as decision tables, pairwise testing and boundary value analysis.
You also want to generate test data automatically which can then be used by the tests.
Initially these tests will be run manually to verify their correctness and ultimately you want to include them in the test execution tool so that they can run unattended.
Which layer of the gTAA will be used to support the specification of the test cases and preparation of the test data?

The generation layer

The definition layer

The execution layer

The adaptation layer

ISTQB CT-TAE certification exam is a valuable certification for professionals who are involved in test automation. Certified Tester Test Automation Engineer certification validates an individual’s expertise in test automation and demonstrates their commitment to the field of software testing. The CT-TAE certification exam is recognized by employers around the world and is conducted by the leading authority in the field of software testing.

Check your preparation for ISTQB CT-TAE On-Demand Exam: https://www.actualpdf.com/CT-TAE_exam-dumps.html

Leave a Reply Cancel reply